Crystal Reports was a tool very used by VB6 developers.
Sometimes when you are migrating a VB6 applications, you find a lot of reports created with this tool.
What should you do? Should you rewrite them on another technology?
Well that really depends on project requirements, but Crystal Reports has good support for VS2010, both for 32 and 64 bit environments.
So you don't need to throw away your reports you can still use Crystal Reports.
However that hard thing to do is where to find Crystal Reports for VS. Do you need to buy some software for that?
I have found that you can download Crystal Reports for VS2010 is just that the links are a little hidden. My friend Victor send me the following information which has been very useful for this task:
a) For Deployment Environment:
1. Download the Redistributable Package for Visual Studio according to the platform (32 bits or 64 bits). And install it. You will find the installer in the following link:
2. Give access to the user executing the IIS process to the path for the Temp Folder (C:\Windows\Temp or the corresponding folder on windows installation).
3. Download the "Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Feature Pack", where you can find the "Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Native Client ". Download the corresponding installer according to the platform of the server (x86, x64 or IA64).
b) For Development environment:
1. Download the "Complete Package" for development on Visual Studio 2010. Please be sure that if you're on a 64 bits machine, you check the "Install 64 bits Runtime" before you click on finish when you complete the installation.
2. Be sure that the current user running on your machine has access to the Temp Folder (C:\Windows\Temp or the corresponding folder on windows installation)
3. If you don't have the Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Native Client Provider (sqlncli10), download the "Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Feature Pack", where you can find the "Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Native Client ". Download the corresponding installer according to the platform of the server (x86, x64 or IA64).
4. To create a new report please be sure you use a "OLE DB (ADO)" Connection and that you're using the "SQL Server Native Client 10.0" Provider, and use the right login information. If the report was previously created with a different provider, please change it on the "Set Datasource Location", editing the Provider field.
This is a very strange error that you can find sometimes when working with ADO.NET.
David McKean from MSFT says:
This occurs when you have multiple DataReaders open concurrently on the same connection,
ie you call SqlCommand.ExecuteReader but don't close the SqlDataReader returned by this
method before calling it again (either on the same command or another command on the same connection).
It requires a feature called MultipleActiveResultSets which is not available in all providers.
For example SQL2000 does not support it, it was implemented starting from SQL2005.
Also .NET 2.0 must be used.
For more information about enabling Multiple Active Result Sets see: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/h32h3abf(v=vs.80).aspx
A good recommendation to make sure that the the readers are closed is to put them inside a using statement, in that case,
no matter if an exception happened they will be closed and disposed.
If you are using SQL Server 2000, MARS is not available so you can create two different connection objects.
Another good article about this issue is: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/spike/archive/2009/08/20/there-is-already-an-open-datareader-associated-with-this-command-which-must-be-closed-first-explained.aspx
But in general to use it is just a change in the connection string:
<connectionStrings>
<clear />
<add name="VasquezDB"
connectionString="Data Source=rvasquez;Initial Catalog=VasquezDB;
Integrated Security=True;MultipleActiveResultSets=Yes" />
</connectionStrings>
Good Luck
NOTE: a good link with more details about MARS is:
http://blog.typps.com/2011/04/mars-multiple-active-result-sets.html
As I use to start stories to my kids when they go to bed:
“A long long time ago when I was a kid there existed a tool called
.NET Reflector, by a great wizard called Lutz Roeder. This wizard created
a magical tool that allowed you to discover what where the dark forces of the
Framework that produced weird behavior. And he provided it to the code warrior so
they could find their path”
Well .NET Reflector still exists and is a great tool, but is no longer free. You can no longer
just download it and enjoy its bliss : S
But is everything loss. Should I sell my sword and horse to be able to use the .NET reflector Oracle jQuery15203662828153464943_1359277348820?
No. There are now good free alternatives.
First one is call ILSpy(http://wiki.sharpdevelop.net/ILSpy.ashx). It looks almost the same as .NET reflector. Is not the same but is very good
And recently JetBrains a clan of powerful code warlocks, has just release another magical jewel,
they called it dotPeek (http://www.jetbrains.com/decompiler/):
I just came back from executing a Ready assessment for a company in Minnesota, where I analyzed 740,000 lines of code in a VB6 application, of which 660,000 belonged to a single Visual Basic project (.vbp). This is actually the largest single .vbp I have seen so far, beating the previous record of about 500,000 lines of code held by an European company. We have migrated plenty of applications that contain 1+ million lines of code, but they are usually distributed across many .vbp’s.
Though unusual, single vbp’s of this size are perfectly manageable from a migration standpoint, and here are some things that can be done to deal with them:
- Ensure that the migration computer has at the very minimum, 3GB of RAM.
- Look for customization opportunities before you start migrating the code. Customizing the VBUC for this specific VBP can reduce manual effort drastically.
- When making manual changes, start with a small team until you get the project to compile, especially if migrating to VB.NET as the compiler has a maximum of build errors that it can show at any given time.
- Once the application compiles, increase the team size and go for Visual Equivalence by distributing the different forms and user controls across your developers.
Visual Basic 6.0 property pages allow you to work around the
limitations of the Visual Basic Property Browser. For example,
you can use property pages to give users a way to add a collections of
colors to a color list user control.
In the property page you would write code that manages the collection,
something beyond the capabilities of the Visual Basic Property Browser.
In contrast, the Visual Basic .NET Property Browser can be used
to edit any .NET variable type or class. Property Pages are no longer needed.
The Upgrade Wizard and the VBUC do not automatically upgrade your
Visual Basic 6.0 property pages but they can sure be of help.
What if you really what to keep those property pages? Is there any workaround.
mmmm Sure there is.
You can follow these steps.
1. Before migrating your Visual Basic 6.0 project with the VBUC
modify your property pages (.pag) files to resemble common Visual Basic 6.0 forms.
For example a property page looks like this:
VERSION 5.00
Begin VB.PropertyPage PropertyPage1
Caption = "PropertyPage1"
ClientHeight = 3600
ClientLeft = 0
ClientTop = 0
ClientWidth = 4800
PaletteMode = 0 'Halftone
ScaleHeight = 3600
ScaleWidth = 4800
Begin VB.TextBox Text1
Height = 495
Left = 480
TabIndex = 1
Text = "Text1"
Top = 1200
Width = 2175
End
Begin VB.CommandButton Command1
Caption = "Command1"
Height = 615
Left = 3120
TabIndex = 0
Top = 480
Width = 1455
End
Begin VB.Label Label1
Caption = "Label1"
Height = 375
Left = 240
TabIndex = 2
Top = 600
Width = 1815
End
End
Attribute VB_Name = "PropertyPage1"
Attribute VB_GlobalNameSpace = False
Attribute VB_Creatable = False
Attribute VB_PredeclaredId = False
Attribute VB_Exposed = False
Can be turned into a Form, to ease migration with simple changes:
VERSION 5.00
Begin VB.Form PropertyPage1
Caption = "PropertyPage1"
ClientHeight = 3600
ClientLeft = 0
ClientTop = 0
ClientWidth = 4800
PaletteMode = 0 'Halftone
ScaleHeight = 3600
ScaleWidth = 4800
Begin VB.TextBox Text1
Height = 495
Left = 480
TabIndex = 1
Text = "Text1"
Top = 1200
Width = 2175
End
Begin VB.CommandButton Command1
Caption = "Command1"
Height = 615
Left = 3120
TabIndex = 0
Top = 480
Width = 1455
End
Begin VB.Label Label1
Caption = "Label1"
Height = 375
Left = 240
TabIndex = 2
Top = 600
Width = 1815
End
End
Attribute VB_Name = "PropertyPage1"
Attribute VB_GlobalNameSpace = False
Attribute VB_Creatable = False
Attribute VB_PredeclaredId = False
Attribute VB_Exposed = False
If the form had a event like:
Private Sub PropertyPage_Initialize()
End Sub
Change that to Form_Load()
2. Rename the file from .pag to .frm.
3. Remove the .pag from the VB6 project
4. Add the .frm file to the VB6 project
5. Run the VBUC tool.
Once migrated you have a close migration of your original Property Page.
Remember however that some things change in .NET and you will need to manually finish some details.
For example, you need to review code in the
PropertyPage_ApplyChanges(),
PropertyPage_EditProperty(PropertyName As String)
PropertyPage_SelectionChanged().
Ok. Once you take your Property Page to .NET how do you integrate it with your control.
Well that’s easy. There you could create a ControlDesigner or just use an UITypeEditor.
Let’s see the UITypeEditor aproach.
The general idea with this aproach is to provide an UITypeEditor (this is just a way to provide an
editor in the property Browser that is not supported by default. And taking advantage of that editor
we will show the form that was produced after migrating out Property Pages. If you want an interface
more similar to what you had on Visual Basic 6.0 you can modify the property page and add a TabControl.
Ok. So these are the steps to follow:
1. First you need to create a type for which you will provide a Type Editor. We will call this type CustomData
namespace CustomEditor
{
public class CustomData
{
}
}
2.Now we will add a property to our control.
public CustomData Custom
{
get;
set;
}
3. Now add attributes to associate an editor
[Description("Custom"), Editor(typeof(CustomDataEditor), typeof(UITypeEditor))]
public CustomData Custom
{
get;
set;
}
4. And now lets implement the CustomDataEditor
using System.Windows.Forms.Design;
namespace CustomEditor
{
public class CustomDataEditor : UITypeEditor
{
public CustomDataEditor() {}
public override UITypeEditorEditStyle GetEditStyle(System.ComponentModel.ITypeDescriptorContext context)
{
return UITypeEditorEditStyle.Modal;
}
public override object EditValue(System.ComponentModel.ITypeDescriptorContext context, IServiceProvider provider, object value)
{
IWindowsFormsEditorService frmsvr = (IWindowsFormsEditorService)provider.GetService(typeof(IWindowsFormsEditorService));
if (frmsvr == null) return null;
PropertyPageForm propPage = new PropertyPageForm();
propPage.control = (MyControl)context.Instance;
frmsvr.ShowDialog(f);
return null;
}
}
}
5. In the previous put attention to the highlighted details. What we are doing is getting a reference
to the WindowsFormEditor service so we property open the PropertyPage that has now been turned into a form.
It is important that you add a public property to the migrated PropertyPage like:
public MyControl control { get; set; };
because that will give you a reference to the actual control that is on the form. The property page is just an interface
you will need to set the values into properties on your control, in order for them to be serialized.
6. Once you do that, when you see the property editor for your control you will see something like:
When you press the … button it will show up your property page form.
You could also add other visual elements like:
Or
But that is maybe for another post.
Regards
The following C# code shows how to use WMI to query printers information, set and get default printer.
public bool SetDefaultPrinter()
{
System.Management.ManagementObjectSearcher search =
default(System.Management.ManagementObjectSearcher);
System.Management.ManagementObjectCollection results =
default(System.Management.ManagementObjectCollection);
System.Management.ManagementObject printer =
default(System.Management.ManagementObject);
search =
new System.Management.ManagementObjectSearcher("select * from win32_printer");
results = search.Get();
//Get Default Printer
System.Management.ManagementObject defaultPrinter = null;
foreach (System.Management.ManagementObject foundPrinter in results)
{
System.Management.PropertyDataCollection
propertyDataCollection = foundPrinter.Properties;
if ((bool)foundPrinter["Default"]) // DEFAULT PRINTER
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(foundPrinter["Name"]);
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(foundPrinter["Location"]);
}
}
//Sets new default Printer
foreach (System.Management.ManagementObject foundPrinter in results)
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.Print(foundPrinter["Name"].ToString());
if (foundPrinter["Name"].Equals("PDFCreator"))
{
System.Management.ManagementBaseObject outParams =
foundPrinter.InvokeMethod("SetDefaultPrinter", null, null);
if (outParams == null)
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("Unable to set default printer");
Int32 retVal = (int)(uint)outParams.Properties["ReturnValue"].Value;
if (retVal == 0)
return true;
else
return false;
}
}
return false;
}
For VB6 applications it is common to rely on OS or Kernel API Calls. Some of those APIs might
need you to send data back and for the native API.
Marshalling in .NET can be complicated and bothersome. I have published several posts about
interop. But it usually depends on adding several marshalling attributes and even tricks specially for
fixed strings.
So I decided to provide a more a simpler approach for conversion. In this approach you just need to things:
1. Your VB6 types or structs will be mapped to .NET classes
2. All VB6 type or struct fields will be mapped to public fields
3. An attribute must be used on those fields to indicate the field length, for arrays or strings.
4. Extension methods .AsString() .SetFromString and .GetClassLength will handle all the complexities of setting the struct fields.
Let’s see an example:
Type EmployeeRecord
FirstName As String * 5
LastName As String * 5
End Type
That vb6 type will be mapped in .NET following this approach to:
public class EmployeeRecord
{
[FixedLength(5)]
public string FirstName = "Mau";
[FixedLength(5)]
public string LastName = "Rojas";
}
You can then simple use that class in .NET
var emp = new EmployeeRecord {FirstName="Mauricio",LastName="Rojas"} ;
var str = emp.AsString();
//This str value will be "MauriRojas" the helper extension methods
// .AsString and .SetFromString will handle setting the internal class fields
All that is very good but how is this used in Marshalling?? Well very simple. Let’s say you have a Dll called foo.dll
with a function foo that receives an EmployeeRecord:
[DllImport("foo.dll")]
public static extern int foo(IntPtr Struct);
Then if you want to call that function you will do something like:
var emp = new EmployeeRecord { FirstName="Ann",LastName="Smith"};
string str = emp.AsString();
var ptr = IntPtr.Zero;
ptr = Marshal.StringToBSTR(str);
//or
ptr = Marshal.StringToHGlobalAnsi(str);
//or
ptr = Marshal.StringToHGlobalAuto(str);
//or
ptr = Marshal.StringToHGlobalUni(str);
//And call the native function
foo(ptr);
If the function modifies the structure and you want to reflect those changes then you will do something like:
str = Marshal.PtrToStringAnsi(ptr,typeof(EmployeeRecord).GetClassLength())
emp.SetFromString(str);
This solution can also be applied for more complex structures. For example:
public class EmployeeRecord
{
[FixedLength(5)]
public string FirstName = "Mau";
[FixedLength(5)]
public string LastName = "Rojas";
}
public class Record1
{
public int field1;
[FixedLength(10)]
public string field2 = "";
public EmployeeRecord rec = new EmployeeRecord();
}
public class GeneralInfo
{
public int field1;
[ArrayLength(5)]
[FixedLength(2)]
public String[] countrycodes = { "cr","es","mx","pa","ni"};
[FixedLength(2)]
public EmployeeRecord[] employees;
}
If you want to try it out this is the link to the CODE
If you were in VB6 HelpContextID will be familiar for you (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa267690(v=vs.60).aspx). In those sweet VB6 days all you had to do was:
Private Sub Form_Load ()
App.HelpFile = "VB.HLP"
Frame1.HelpContextID = 21004
Text1.HelpContextID = 21001
Form1.HelpContextID = 21005
End Sub
And each time you pressed the F1 button your application will have opened the .hlp file and show you the Help Topic corresponding to that ID. After migration from VB6 to WinForms Help you now have the HelpProvider.SetHelpKeyword http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.forms.helpprovider.sethelpkeyword.aspx And you had to do something like:
internal System.Windows.Forms.HelpProvider HelpProvider1;
...
HelpProvider1.HelpNamespace = "sample.chm";
HelpProvider1.SetHelpKeyword(TextBox1, "1007.html");
HelpProvider1.SetHelpNavigator(TextBox1, HelpNavigator.Topic);
HelpProvider1.SetHelpKeyword(ListBox1, "1006.html");
HelpProvider1.SetHelpNavigator(ListBox1, HelpNavigator.Topic);
And all that seems nice. But, what can you do when you cross over to SilverlightjQuery15205164761650376022_1357918518660? Well, in general there are several systems that allow you to author your help files in html or convert your .hlp or .chm files to html, but how do you link your components to that help system in order to provide context-sensitive help???? Ok. So one of the possible solutions is very very simple. In general, the solution that I will show in this post is this: 1) First implement an attached property for adding a HelpKeyword to Silverlight components 2) Set the helpkeyword in the desired components 3) Provide logic that will open the appropiate help file. Ok. So let's implement a Silverlight Attached property. An attached propery is like adding a new property to your controls. This new attached property will be called Helpkeyword
using System;
using System.Windows.Shapes;
namespace System.Windows.Controls
{
public class HelpProvider
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty HelpKeyword =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("HelpKeyword", typeof(string), typeof(HelpProvider), new PropertyMetadata(null));
public static void SetHelpKeyword(UIElement element, string keyword)
{
element.SetValue(HelpKeyword, keyword);
}
public static string GetHelpKeyword(UIElement element)
{
return (string)element.GetValue(HelpKeyword);
}
}
}
Ok. So once we have the attached property we have to use it, and set it on the code: To set it on the code we must add a namespace:
<UserControl x:Class="SilverlightApplication.MainPage"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
...
xmlns:help="clr-namespace:System.Windows.Controls"
mc:Ignorable="d"
....>
And apply the attribute to components
<Button help:HelpProvider.HelpKeyword="helpforbutton1" Content="Button" ... />
<TextBox help:HelpProvider.HelpKeyword="helpfortext1" Height="47" ... />
So that almost everything, now we just need to trigger the appropiate logic, to do that we will add a KeyUp handler to the top most element, in this example a grid. NOTE: if Silverlight is running on the browser F1 is not an option. I just used F2 here as an example.
<Grid x:Name="LayoutRoot" Background="White" Height="205" KeyUp="LayoutRoot_KeyUp">
<Button help:HelpProvider.HelpKeyword="helpforbutton1" ... />
<TextBox help:HelpProvider.HelpKeyword="helpfortext1" ... />
</Grid>
using System;
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Controls;
using System.Windows.Input;
using System.Windows.Browser;
namespace SilverlightApplication
{
public partial class MainPage : UserControl
{
public MainPage()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void LayoutRoot_KeyUp(object sender, KeyEventArgs e)
{
//check for the specific key. For now use F2 as the Help Shortcut
if (e.Key==Key.F2) {
var uielement = FocusManager.GetFocusedElement() as UIElement;
if (uielement!=null)
{
var keyword = HelpProvider.GetHelpKeyword(uielement);
var host = HtmlPage.Document.DocumentUri.Host;
var port = HtmlPage.Document.DocumentUri.Port;
var url = string.Format("http://{0}:{1}/help/{2}.html", host,port,keyword);
HtmlPage.Window.Navigate(new Uri(url),"_blank");
}
} // else ignore the keystroke
}
}
}
This property can be used on the IDE:
On code
var uielement = FocusManager.GetFocusedElement() as UIElement;
if (uielement!=null) {
var keyword = HelpProvider.GetHelpKeyword(uielement);
}
This is an image of the application running.
And you can download the code from: CODE
If you have any questions or would like more info on Silverlight migration check www.silverlightmigration.com
Windows Azure is a great platform and the escalatity oportunities are great,
and deployment time is also great.
You can have all your website up and running in just 10-15minutes.
But… and yes there is always a but.
Sometimes you can have a WebSite that is not that static, that as a matter of fact
you are changing its views constantly. Specially if some ideas are not finished.
And yes you can test locally, but there is also a situation where you might want to have that flexibility.
Well looking around I found a very interesting solution by
Maatern Balliauw. http://blog.maartenballiauw.be/post/2009/06/09/A-view-from-the-cloud-(or-locate-your-ASPNET-MVC-views-on-Windows-Azure-Blob-Storage).aspx
What he proposes is to use windows azure storage as a virtual file system, so you can with simple tools
like the Windows Azure Explorer modify your web pages without the need of going through a lengthy republish process.
So go ahead and keep enyoing Azure
While solving a bug with a custom class that extended the System.Data.DataSet class, I found a situation where the class implemented, the ISerializable interface, but for some reason, during the call to the base.GetObjectData in my serialization code it was trying to get the value of some properties that caused an exception.
The reason was that those properties were not “ready” because my serialization code had not finish initializing the object. But why was the Dataset.GetObjectData trying to get or set those values.
It seems that there is some code in the dataset that used reflection to get the object properties and try to serialize them. I did not want that.
How could I stop the framework from doing that?
I thought of the NonSerializable attribute but that works only on fields and what I have is a property.
I thought of the XmlIgnore attribute but it had no effect.
Why!!!!
Well I finally found that you can add a couple of (not attributes) methods to your component.
They should be named Reset<Property>() and ShouldSerialize<Property>() and returning a boolean value
from these functions will control if the properties are serialized or not.
For more info see MSDN page for ShouldSerialize
VB6 and WinForms ListBox has the built in capability to provide a simple data look up. But the Silverlight ListBox does not.
So if you have a list with items:
Apple
Airplane
Blueberry
Bee
Car
Zoo
Animal Planet
And your current item is Apple when you press A the next current item will be Airplane
Apple
Airplane
Blueberry
Bee
Car
Zoo
Animal Planet
And the next time you press A the next current item will be Animal Planet
Apple
Airplane
Blueberry
Bee
Car
Zoo
Animal Planet
And the next time you press A the next current item will be Apple again
Ok to do in Silverlight you need to add a event handler. You can create a user control and this event handler and replace your listbox for your custom listbox or just add this event handler for the listboxes that need it. The code you need is the following:
void listbox1_KeyDown(object sender, KeyEventArgs e)
{
String selectedText = this.listbox1.SelectedItem.ToString();
String keyAsString = e.Key.ToString();
int maxItems = listbox1.Items.Count;
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(selectedText) &&
!String.IsNullOrEmpty(keyAsString) && keyAsString.Length == 1 &&
maxItems > 1)
{
int currentIndex = this.listbox1.SelectedIndex;
int nextIndex = (currentIndex + 1) % maxItems;
while (currentIndex != nextIndex)
{
if (this.listbox1.Items[nextIndex].ToString().ToUpper().StartsWith(keyAsString))
{
this.listbox1.SelectedIndex = nextIndex;
return;
}
nextIndex = (nextIndex + 1) % maxItems;
}
//NOTE: theres is a slight different behaviour because for example in
//winforms if your only had an item that started with A and press A the selectionIndex
//will not change but a SelectedIndexChanged event (equivalent to SelectionChanged in Silverlight)
//and this is not the Silverlight behaviour
}
}
During a migration from ASP to ASP.NET one of the biggest hurdles is finding a way to deal with the include files.
ASP was a interpreted environment whether ASP.NET is compiled and this difference is very important because you need to find ways more natural in .NET to do some things you used to do in ASP.
For example in ASP you used to have a set of common functionality that was included in your files. What will you do with that?
For ASP ASP.NET in VB.NET is a lot easier. One of the things you can do is move all those common subs and functions to a Module.
Now if what you have is a ASP.NET Web Site, then just your new modules to the App_Code folder and voila your pages are now able to see that code.
For a ASP.NET Web Application is just a little differente. What you have to do is move your common variables, constants, subs and functions to a Module, but that is not enough to make that code reachable from your mark up, so you have two alternatives:
1. Add an %@import Namespace=”QualfiedNamespaces.Module1” statement for each of your modules.
2. Modify your web.config file and add under system.web something like:
<system.web>
<pages>
<namespaces>
<add namespace="WebApplication1.Module1"/>
</namespaces>
</pages>
That will add an implicit import for all your pages.
For C# it can be a little more complicated. Because you do not have modules like in VB.NET, what you can do is use extension methods, to have a similiar syntax.
In .NET Framework 2.0 the attribute configSource was added to several elements of the .NET config files so you could use external files.
Sadly those attribute are not available for the system.serviceModel.However I found this post that shows a interesting workaround.
You can modify your serviceModel file to look like this:
<configuration>
<system.serviceModel>
<services configSource="Services.config" >
</services>
<bindings configSource="Bindings.config">
</bindings>
<behaviors configSource="Behaviors.config">
</behaviors>
</system.serviceModel>
</configuration>
And then you can put your configuration settings in separate files like the following:
Behaviors.config
<configuration>
<system.serviceModel>
<services configSource="Services.config" >
</services>
<bindings configSource="Bindings.config">
</bindings>
<behaviors configSource="Behaviors.config">
</behaviors>
</system.serviceModel>
</configuration>
For more details see the full post by Pablo Cibraro
If you ever get an error like, it is an annoying situation where the web server is trying to use and old compilation of your aspx files.
The workaround I have is: rename web.config to stopweb.config.
Browse to the offending page URL it will return an error. After you receive the error rename stopweb.config to web.config
Browse to the offending page. This will force the server to compile the web pages.
And if it work the problem will now go away.
I you were looking for a way to do that just take a look at this post: http://weblogs.asp.net/whaggard/archive/2004/08/30/223020.aspx
Just notice that for this post you need to add this struct:
[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)]
public struct SHFILEINFO
{
public IntPtr hIcon;
public IntPtr iIcon;
public uint dwAttributes;
[MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.ByValTStr, SizeConst = 260)]
public string szDisplayName;
[MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.ByValTStr, SizeConst = 80)]
public string szTypeName;
};
In VB6 when you have an ActiveX Library it was very important to use
the BinaryCompatibility setting to make sure that your applications did not break after a change.
So let’s first introduce what is binary compatibility and how to accomplish that in .NET.
Binary Compatibility allows to make changes to your components or COM classes without recompiling
every application you've made that uses the component.
And why do you need it. Why compatibility breaks.
On lets see.
An ActiveX Control or DLL expose Public interfaces.
Those interfaces have all of the properties, methods, events, etc. that you've marked as Public.
In other words, everything you've added that shows in Intellisense while working outside of your component.
Now let's say you have create a class, with two Methods Method1 and Method2
When you compile, VB generates all the COM infraestructure you need for your component.
It defines a CoClass and an interface and an entry for each method.
For a vb class with two methods:
Sub Method1()
End Sub
Sub Method2()
End Sub
It will produce a typelib like:
// Generated .IDL file (by the OLE/COM Object Viewer)
//
// typelib filename: <could not determine filename>
[
uuid(8ABA2C0C-7CCA-40CD-A944-56707566634A),
version(1.0)
]
library Project1
{
// TLib : // TLib : OLE Automation : {00020430-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}
importlib("stdole2.tlb");
// Forward declare all types defined in this typelib
interface _Class1;
[
odl,
uuid(6B86684C-B3DD-4680-BF95-8DEE2C17AF5B),
version(1.0),
hidden,
dual,
nonextensible,
oleautomation
]
interface _Class1 : IDispatch {
[id(0x60030000)]
HRESULT Method1();
[id(0x60030001)]
HRESULT Method2();
};
[
uuid(C71C7AB0-552A-4D5D-A9FB-AF33830A697E),
version(1.0)
]
coclass Class1 {
[default] interface _Class1;
};
};
As you can see in the typelib there are IDs associated to each coclass, interface and
methods. Those IDs are the ones use when you generate the .exe file for your application.
Now if you modify your Class to:
Sub Method3()
End Sub
Sub Method4()
End Sub
Sub Method1()
End Sub
Sub Method2()
End Sub
and you use No Compatibility the typelib after your changes will be:
// Generated .IDL file (by the OLE/COM Object Viewer)
//
// typelib filename: <could not determine filename>
[
uuid(FE5C56C2-E03A-4DC0-994D-B68543C72A46),
version(1.0)
]
library Project1
{
// TLib : // TLib : OLE Automation : {00020430-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}
importlib("stdole2.tlb");
// Forward declare all types defined in this typelib
interface _Class1;
[
odl,
uuid(A3032E1E-52FE-42E0-98FF-84A9DD4FD8C3),
version(1.0),
hidden,
dual,
nonextensible,
oleautomation
]
interface _Class1 : IDispatch {
[id(0x60030000)]
HRESULT Method3();
[id(0x60030001)]
HRESULT Method4();
[id(0x60030002)]
HRESULT Method1();
[id(0x60030003)]
HRESULT Method2();
};
[
uuid(72721504-CC56-4BB9-9447-C7193FE8C02D),
version(1.0)
]
coclass Class1 {
[default] interface _Class1;
};
};
As you can see, now the ids for the methods, CoClass are different, so your applications will return errors like: Error 430 (Automation error, the component dies horribly) or Error 429 (can't create the object at all)
But if you instead used BinaryCompatibility then the typelib for your class will be:
// Generated .IDL file (by the OLE/COM Object Viewer)
//
// typelib filename: <could not determine filename>
[
uuid(8ABA2C0C-7CCA-40CD-A944-56707566634A),
version(1.1)
]
library Project1
{
// TLib : // TLib : OLE Automation : {00020430-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}
importlib("stdole2.tlb");
// Forward declare all types defined in this typelib
interface _Class1;
[
odl,
uuid(6E9C59C3-82D7-444C-92FB-01B49D91A2FF),
version(1.1),
hidden,
dual,
nonextensible,
oleautomation
]
interface _Class1 : IDispatch {
[id(0x60030002)]
HRESULT Method3();
[id(0x60030003)]
HRESULT Method4();
[id(0x60030000)]
HRESULT Method1();
[id(0x60030001)]
HRESULT Method2();
};
[
uuid(C71C7AB0-552A-4D5D-A9FB-AF33830A697E),
version(1.1)
]
coclass Class1 {
[default] interface _Class1;
};
typedef [uuid(6B86684C-B3DD-4680-BF95-8DEE2C17AF5B), version(1.0), public]
_Class1 Class1___v0;
};
If you compare now the two typelibs you can see the Method1 and Method2 keep the same ids.
For each version a typedef is generated that will point to the last version. For example adding a Method5 will add new entry like:
typedef [uuid(6B86684C-B3DD-4680-BF95-8DEE2C17AF5B), version(1.0), public]
_Class1 Class1___v0;
typedef [uuid(6E9C59C3-82D7-444C-92FB-01B49D91A2FF), version(1.1), public]
_Class1 Class1___v1;
Well that is what binary compatibility does. Now how to achieve binary compatibility in .NET
Binary Compatibility in .NET
Achieving binary compatibility in .NET is really easy. You just need to give more information to
make explicit how your typelib information will be. I will follow an approach as the one I already explained in this post:
http://blogs.artinsoft.net/mrojas/archive/2010/06/23/exposing-c-classes-thru-interop.aspx
Lets take our previous example:
using System;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
namespace InteropExamples
{
public class Class1
{
public void Method3()
{
}
public void Method4()
{
}
public void Method1()
{
}
public void Method2()
{
}
public void Method5()
{
}
}
}
In previous posts I had recommended using partial classes and using interfaces to explicitly specify what you what to be seen in COM. This means you start up with something like:
public partial class Class1
{
public void Method3()
{
}
public void Method4()
{
}
public void Method1()
{
}
public void Method2()
{
}
}
[ComVisible(true)]
public interface _Class1
{
void Method3();
void Method4();
void Method1();
void Method2();
}
[ComVisible(true)]
[ClassInterface(ClassInterfaceType.None)]
[ComDefaultInterface(typeof(_Class1))]
partial class Class1 : _Class1
{
#region _Class1 Members
void _Class1.Method3()
{
Method3();
}
void _Class1.Method4()
{
Method4();
}
void _Class1.Method1()
{
Method1();
}
void _Class1.Method2()
{
Method2();
}
#endregion
}
Now to make this code binary compatible then you have to make sure that the tlb file generated for your class is almost identical to that generated before. To acomplish that we must make sure that we your methods, interfaces and classes have the same guids and ids. Lets see how:
using System;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
namespace InteropExamples
{
public partial class Class1
{
public void Method3()
{
System.Windows.Forms.MessageBox.Show("3 N");
}
public void Method4()
{
System.Windows.Forms.MessageBox.Show("4 N");
}
public void Method5()
{
System.Windows.Forms.MessageBox.Show("5 N");
}
public void Method1()
{
System.Windows.Forms.MessageBox.Show("1 N");
}
public void Method2()
{
System.Windows.Forms.MessageBox.Show("2 N");
}
}
[ComVisible(true)] //This to make the interface Visible for COM
[TypeLibType((TypeLibTypeFlags)((short)TypeLibTypeFlags.FHidden |
(short)TypeLibTypeFlags.FDual |
(short)TypeLibTypeFlags.FNonExtensible |
(short)TypeLibTypeFlags.FOleAutomation))] //This to use the same flags as in previous tlb
[Guid("9BAFD76D-8E6B-439C-8B6D-37260BFA3317")] //This is to make the class have the guid
public interface _Class1
{
[DispId(0x60030000)]
void Method1();
[DispId(0x60030001)]
void Method2();
[DispId(0x60030002)]
void Method3();
[DispId(0x60030003)]
void Method4();
[DispId(0x60030004)]
void Method5();
}
[ComVisible(true)] //This to make the class Visible for COM
[ClassInterface(ClassInterfaceType.None)] //This is to make sure that we have control on interface generation
[ComDefaultInterface(typeof(_Class1))] //To set default interface
[ProgId("Project1.Class1")] //To set ProgId
[Guid("C71C7AB0-552A-4D5D-A9FB-AF33830A697E")] //Maintain same Guid.
partial class Class1 : _Class1, Class1___v0, Class1___v1
{
#region _Class1 Members
void _Class1.Method3()
{
Method3();
}
void _Class1.Method4()
{
Method4();
}
void _Class1.Method1()
{
Method1();
}
void _Class1.Method2()
{
Method2();
}
#endregion
#region Class1___v0 Members
void Class1___v0.Method1()
{
Method1();
}
void Class1___v0.Method2()
{
Method2();
}
void Class1___v0.Method3()
{
Method3();
}
void Class1___v0.Method4()
{
Method4();
}
void Class1___v0.Method5()
{
Method5();
}
#endregion
#region Class1___v1 Members
void Class1___v1.Method1()
{
Method1();
}
void Class1___v1.Method2()
{
Method2();
}
void Class1___v1.Method3()
{
Method3();
}
void Class1___v1.Method4()
{
Method4();
}
void Class1___v1.Method5()
{
Method5();
}
#endregion
}
//This is to keep compatibility with old versions
//we cannot generate a typedef so we will need to add all of the versions
//for BinaryCompatibility
[ComVisible(true)]
[Guid("6B86684C-B3DD-4680-BF95-8DEE2C17AF5B")]
[TypeLibType(TypeLibTypeFlags.FHidden)]
public interface Class1___v0
{
[DispId(0x60030000)]
void Method1();
[DispId(0x60030001)]
void Method2();
[DispId(0x60030002)]
void Method3();
[DispId(0x60030003)]
void Method4();
[DispId(0x60030004)]
void Method5();
}
//This is to keep compatibility with old versions
//we cannot generate a typedef so we will need to add all of the versions
//for BinaryCompatibility
[ComVisible(true)]
[Guid("4A7A3317-BF13-443E-9DB0-2C5EA21F00CA")]
[TypeLibType(TypeLibTypeFlags.FHidden)]
public interface Class1___v1
{
[DispId(0x60030000)]
void Method1();
[DispId(0x60030001)]
void Method2();
[DispId(0x60030002)]
void Method3();
[DispId(0x60030003)]
void Method4();
[DispId(0x60030004)]
void Method5();
}
}
Sadly in .NET you cannot use Interface Inheritance in COM. If there is interface inheritance YOU HAVE TO IMPLEMENT each interface. In the case of code that comes from VB6. VB6 just uses typedefs, so you really don’t know which methods belong to each version. So in the end all versions have all methods.
The other alternative to this method, is just to implement last version. And after generating the tlb, decompile it to an .IDL file add the typedefs and recompiled it. I explained something similar in this post:http://blogs.artinsoft.net/mrojas/archive/2010/05/17/interop-remove-prefix-from-c-enums-for-com.aspx
Ok. I hope this helps you to have an more clear idea of what Binary Compatibility is and how to do it in .NET. I am attaching some sample code. It show an ActiveX library that uses BinaryCompatibility and three version on an aplications that uses the different versions. And also a .NET class library that is equivalent to the VB6 one. HERE
Enjoy.
AutoCAD 2010 will not be supporting VBA.
Quoting
“If you utilize VBA macros in your work environment, they will no longer work unless the VBA module is installed on your system. “
“When you run a command that requires VBA, a message dialog box will be displayed stating that VBA is no longer installed with AutoCAD and directing you to a website where you can download the VBA module. “
And also you can see that Autodesk states: “Autodesk is evaluating how long VBA will be supported in Autodesk products in the future. Though supported in the AutoCAD 2010-based products, it may or may not be supported in future releases. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that VB developers develop all new code using VB .NET.”
VBA does not support 64bit systems in a native way.
But If you want some advice from the VB migration experts or help on your migration project from VBA to VB.NET or C# you can us contact Artinsoft Migration Services.
We build the VB Upgrade Wizard that shipped with Visual Studio and have been doing VB migrations for years.
During a migration from a FlexGrid to a DataGridView, we encountered a situation where the HorizontalScrollBar did not show.
I found many suggestions like setting a MinimumColWidth value for all columns, etc.
But it wasn’t until my friend Jesus added a line like:
mygrid.DockStyle = DockStyle.Fill
that the HorizontalScrollBar appear.
It might just be that the grid was too big for form but just for the record this is a possible solution.
In VB6 ActiveX-EXEs or ActiveX OLE Server where used for several
reasons. Sometimes it was performance (because it allowed you to run
your code in another process) and sometimes as way to share resources
between several applications, like connection information, database
connections, mainframe info, etc.
During migration some of this ActiveX-Exes can be migrated as simple
Assembly DLLs, but other require more attention. Specially if they have
global variables that hold state shared by several programs.
In that is your case what are your options then?
1. Convert those ActiveX-Exes to Windows Services.
This option is simple. You modify your migrated assembly to work as a Windows Service. The easier way to do that is:
a) Start Microsoft Visual Studio 2005\2008
b) Go to File\New…\Project… and Select Windows Service
That will generated code like:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.ComponentModel;
using System.Data;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Linq;
using System.ServiceProcess;
using System.Text;
namespace WindowsService1
{
public partial class Service1 : ServiceBase
{
public Service1() { InitializeComponent(); }
protected override void OnStart(string[] args) { }
protected override void OnStop() { }
}
}
c) Add a reference to the Remoting Assemblies: System.Runtime.Remoting;
d) Modify the previous code:
Add two using statements like:
using System.Runtime.Remoting.Channels.Http;
using System.Runtime.Remoting.Channels;
using System.Runtime.Remoting;
Add a simple event log for tracing:
private static EventLog evt = new EventLog(“Application”);
private static string SVC_NAME = “ActiveX Server Example Svc”;
And modify the OnStart and OnStop methods to look like:
protected override void OnStart(string[] args)
{
HttpChannel chnl = new HttpChannel(1234);
ChannelServices.RegisterChannel(chnl,true );
RemotingConfiguration.RegisterWellKnownServiceType(typeof(MyClass), “MyClass.soap”, WellKnownObjectMode.Singleton);
evt.WriteEntry(SVC_NAME + ” Started”);
}
protected override void OnStop() { evt.WriteEntry(SVC_NAME +” Stoppped”); }
Also make sure that MyClass extends MarshalByRefClass
2. Convert those ActiveX-Exes using the Artinsoft ActiveX migration helpers.
Sometimes, you need your migrated application to replicate some of
the original ActiveX EXE \OLE DLL VB6 characteristics. For example you
need your ActiveX-EXE to start just when the first instance is created
and to resemble the VB6 logic for Process creation\destruction.
For that purpose Artinsoft has created some helpers that our
migration tool is able to automatically use in the generated code if it
detects that this functionality is needed.
The code will then be changed from:
Dim myInstance As New MyProject.MyClass
To the following Helper method:
myInstance = MyProjectFactory.Create< MyProject.MyClass>(myInstance);
And destroy calls can be changed to the following Helper method:
myInstance= MyProjectFactory.Dispose<MyProject.MyClass >( myInstance);
The migration tool will modify your ActiveX-EXEs or OLE Servers to
be Windows EXE and the helper will then locate the assembly that
contains the desired Class, create an instance and initilize a Remoting
channel to the desired classes. Settings as SingleUse and MultiUse are
also taken care by the helpers.
3. Other possible alternatives are using WFC and COM+ that I will comment in another post.
To be able to catch popup windows and open them in your own window you
have to manage WebBrowser events like NewWindow2.
But how do you do that in WPF?
Well it isn’t really that difficult. These are the steps that you have to follow:
1. Add a COM reference to a reference to %windir%\system32\shdocvw.dll
2. Add a new CodeFile to your project. Lets say CodeFile1.cs And put this code:
using System;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
[ComImport, InterfaceType(ComInterfaceType.InterfaceIsIUnknown)]
[Guid("6d5140c1-7436-11ce-8034-00aa006009fa")]
internal interface IServiceProvider
{
[return: MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.IUnknown)]
object QueryService(ref Guid guidService, ref Guid riid);
}
3. To make an easy example. Lets assume we have a very simple window like:
And in that form we need some code like this:
private void button1_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
Guid SID_SWebBrowserApp =
new Guid("0002DF05-0000-0000-C000-000000000046");
IServiceProvider serviceProvider =
(IServiceProvider)myWebBrowser.Document; //<—It seams that you need to
// navigate first to initialize this
Guid serviceGuid = SID_SWebBrowserApp;
Guid iid = typeof(SHDocVw.IWebBrowser2).GUID;
//Here we will get a reference to the IWebBrowser2 interface
SHDocVw.IWebBrowser2 myWebBrowser2 =
(SHDocVw.IWebBrowser2)
serviceProvider.QueryService(ref serviceGuid, ref iid);
//To hook events we just need to do these casts
SHDocVw.DWebBrowserEvents_Event wbEvents =
(SHDocVw.DWebBrowserEvents_Event)myWebBrowser2;
SHDocVw.DWebBrowserEvents2_Event wbEvents2 =
(SHDocVw.DWebBrowserEvents2_Event)myWebBrowser2;
//Adding event handlers is now very simple
wbEvents.NewWindow +=
new SHDocVw.DWebBrowserEvents_NewWindowEventHandler(wbEvents_NewWindow);
wbEvents2.NewWindow2 +=
new SHDocVw.DWebBrowserEvents2_NewWindow2EventHandler(wbEvents2_NewWindow2);
}
void wbEvents2_NewWindow2(ref object ppDisp, ref bool Cancel)
{
//If you want make popup windows to open in your own window
// you need to assign the ppDisp to the .Application of
// the WebBrowser in your window
Window1 wnd = new Window1();
wnd.Show();
//Just navigate to make sure .Document is initilialized
wnd.myWebBrowser.Navigate(new Uri("about:blank"));
Guid SID_SWebBrowserApp = new Guid("0002DF05-0000-0000-C000-000000000046");
IServiceProvider serviceProvider = (IServiceProvider)wnd.myWebBrowser.Document;
Guid serviceGuid = SID_SWebBrowserApp;
Guid iid = typeof(SHDocVw.IWebBrowser2).GUID;
SHDocVw.IWebBrowser2 myWebBrowser2 = (SHDocVw.IWebBrowser2)serviceProvider.QueryService(ref serviceGuid, ref iid);
ppDisp = myWebBrowser2.Application;
}
void wbEvents_NewWindow(string URL, int Flags, string TargetFrameName, ref object PostData, string Headers, ref bool Processed)
{
MessageBox.Show(URL);
}
private void button2_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
myWebBrowser.Navigate(new Uri("file://D:/MyProjects/ExtendedBrowserExample_v2/test0.htm"));
}
Now you can manage your popupwindows:
You can download the test application from HERE